Measure

Statistics

Over-the-board games in full depth, then just the my online aggregated.

Over the board · FIDE

The record

Games: 97; 2009–2017
Record: 48–18–31; W–D–L
Score: 59%; 57 / 97 pts
Performance: 2202; Elo, whole collection
Avg opponent: 2140; FIDE
Toughest opponent: 2646; Najer, Evgeniy

Skill fingerprint

index 84 · 97 games

index

Each axis is a 0 to 100 index from the Stockfish review of 97 games. Hover any spoke for the figure behind it; it is a comparison index, not an official rating.

Rating over time

200021002200

2009201020112014201520162017

Peak 2249 · 97 rated games · dots tinted by result

The official lists

every published ECF and FIDE rating

FIDE

140016001800200022002400

ECF rescaleECF 2537FIDE 2249

20052010201520202025

ECF peak 2553 · FIDE peak 2249 · dots mark lists that moved the rating · pre-2020 ECF in new money (x 7.5 + 700)

Results by year

Win
Draw
Loss

09'09

10'10

11'11

14'14

15'15

16'16

17'17

Game length

<20

20–29

30–39

40–49

50–59

60+

Full moves · longest 111

By colour

As White24/10/2054%

As Black24/8/1165%

Vs opponent strength

< 200018/2/383%

2000–219919/4/1260%

2200–23997/6/1142%

2400–25993/6/446%

2600+0/0/10%

Online · Lichess & Chess.com

The online record

Games: 19,166; 2019–2026
Record: 10.5K–662–7,973; W–D–L
Score: 57%; 10862 / 19166 pts
Avg opponent: 2015; online rating

By time control

Bullet9041/558/705356%

Blitz1384/99/88161%

Rapid103/5/3673%

Classical3/0/350%

By colour

Win
Draw
Loss

As White5372/297/391458%

As Black5159/365/405956%

Online results by year

Win
Draw
Loss

424

19'19

5230

20'20

2974

21'21

3389

22'22

1735

23'23

1881

24'24

2445

25'25

1088

26'26

Most-played openings

Modern Defense1518/86/100160%

Sicilian Defense: Mengarini Variation1272/62/84860%

Queen's Pawn Game: Modern Defense591/51/51153%

Modern Defense: Standard Defense540/42/40757%

French Defense: Exchange Variation417/30/38652%

Modern Defense: Two Knights Variation301/21/21658%

Accuracy & move quality

Avg accuracy: 88.1%; 97 games reviewed
As White: 87.2%
As Black: 89.1%
Mean ACPL: 34; centipawns/move
Error rate: 24.5; per 100 moves
Cleanest game: 99.0%; see library

Replay the cleanest game →

The shape of an average game

hero eval · 97 games

+3.50.0-3.5

even

out of bookmidgameinto the end

Mean eval over 97 reviewed games · band = middle 50% · out of book -0.1 · midgame +0.2 · into the end +0.7

Move quality

3964 moves

2030Best51%
962Good24%
530Inaccuracy13%
253Mistake6%
181Blunder5%
8Miss0%

Accuracy vs strength

<200023g

2000–219935g

2200–239924g

2400–259913g

2600+1g

Mean accuracy % by opponent band

Accuracy distribution

<70

70–80

80–90

90–95

95+

Games by accuracy band

Strength against accuracy

every reviewed game

5060708090100

~1500~2000~2400

160018002000220024002600

96 reviewed games · x opponent Elo · y accuracy % · dots tinted by result · teal guides ≈ 1500 / 2000 / 2400-level accuracy

Where accuracy goes by phase

Opening

95.0%

13 ACPL · ~2623

9% of cp lost

Middlegame

92.0%

29 ACPL · ~2489

39% of cp lost

Endgame

92.1%

60 ACPL · ~2493

52% of cp lost

Errors by move number

Inaccuracy
Mistake
Blunder

212

1–10

269

11–20

234

21–30

148

31–40

41–50

51+

Style & tendencies

Est. strength: 2312; accuracy-derived
Sharpness: 32; cp swing / move
First slip: move 5; avg first error
Only-moves found: 92%; 336/367 forced

Accuracy by result

win

90.4%

48g

draw

91.5%

18g

loss

82.5%

31g

Mean accuracy by how the game ended

Game volatility

sharpness 32cp

calm

steady

tense

sharp

wild

Games by mean eval swing per move (calm → wild)

Decisiveness

Winning positions converted

79%

Won 48 of 61 games where the eval reached +2 or better.

Lost positions salvaged

34%

Drew or won 16 of 47 games where the eval fell to −2 or worse.

Openings

ECO A·15 B·56 C·19 D·1 E·6

Modern Defense: Standard Defense5/3/172%

Sicilian Defense: Mengarini Variation1/2/525%

Italian Game: Scotch Gambit, Max Lange Attack1/1/150%

Sicilian Defense: Closed1/1/150%

Modern Defense1/1/150%

Queen's Pawn Game: Modern Defense3/0/0100%

Modern Defense: Two Knights Variation0/2/050%

Sicilian Defense: Delayed Alapin Variation, with d61/0/150%

Caro-Kann Defense: Advance Variation, Botvinnik-Carls Defense1/1/075%

French Defense: Rubinstein Variation, Blackburne Defense2/0/0100%

English Opening: Anglo-Indian Defense1/0/150%

French Defense: Tarrasch Variation, Closed Variation1/0/150%

How to read this board

Accuracy: How close the moves were to the engine's best, on the Lichess win-percentage model. 100% is flawless.
ACPL: Average centipawn loss per move. Lower is better; a clean game sits in the low tens.
Performance: The rating a score implies against the average opponent faced (the standard FIDE formula).
Est. strength: Elo implied by accuracy alone (about 45 × accuracy − 1650). A comparison index, not an official rating.
Sharpness: Average evaluation swing per move, in centipawns. Higher means wilder, more double-edged games.
First slip: The average move number of the first inaccuracy or worse. Later is steadier.
Only-moves found: Of positions with a single best move, how often it was found. A read on tactical alertness.
Conversion: How often a winning position (+2 or better) was turned into the full point.
Resilience: How often a losing position (−2 or worse) was still saved to a draw or win.
Fingerprint index: Six facets of play each scaled to 0–100 from the review. A way to rank one's own strengths, not a rating.

Win-rates are from Webb's perspective. Accuracy, move classifications and ACPL come from the precomputed Stockfish review (Lichess win% model); 97 of 97 games are reviewed so far. Add more PGNs and every chart deepens automatically.